mirror of
https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts.git
synced 2024-06-28 16:45:46 +02:00
Better explanation of why we use the 0.0.0.0 address.
Just the readme_template.md file is changed. All the other readme files in this commit are generated. Closes Issue #68.
This commit is contained in:
parent
024c421e9d
commit
33e35573f0
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
20
readme.md
20
readme.md
|
@ -125,17 +125,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -117,17 +117,23 @@ For example, to nullify requests to some doubleclick.net servers, adding these l
|
|||
file will do it:
|
||||
|
||||
# block doubleClick's servers
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
127.0.0.1 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ae.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.ar.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.at.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.au.doubleclick.net
|
||||
0.0.0.0 ad.be.doubleclick.net
|
||||
# etc...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## We recommend using `0.0.0.0` instead of `127.0.0.1`
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is faster because you don't have to wait for a timeout. It also does not interfere
|
||||
with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally most host files use `127.0.0.1`, the *loopback address*, to establish an IP connection to the local machine.
|
||||
|
||||
We prefer to use ``0.0.0.0`, which is defined as a non-routable meta-address used to designate an invalid, unknown,
|
||||
or non applicable target.
|
||||
|
||||
Using `0.0.0.0` is empirically faster, possibly because there's no wait for a timeout resolution. It also does not
|
||||
interfere with a web server that may be running on the local PC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why not use just `0` instead of `0.0.0.0`?
|
||||
We tried that. Using `0` doesn't work universally.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user